This is the last in my blog trio about Butabika hospital, Uganda’s premier psychiatric facility, which I visited last Thursday (3 April 2014). The first blog post focused on lawlessness and the second on women. This blog post focuses on clinical practice and human rights.
Much has recently been written about ill-treatment in healthcare, including a phenomenally interesting book edited by Juan Mendez, the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture (I have a chapter in there, which was dramatically serialized in this and this and this blog posts!
When a human rights monitor visits a psychiatric hospital, it’s actually very difficult to figure out what to do with information about medical treatment. What, after all, is the relationship between medicine and human rights? How can a medically unqualified human rights monitor even ask questions about treatments? It’s a good idea to bring a doctor into the monitoring team. This was not possible for our Ugandan monitoring, so here are some tips about non-medics monitoring psychiatric hospitals.
First, medication is central to human rights in a psychiatric hospital. There are two important things which I always look out for: what and how.
WHAT: The question is what is the medication? What type is it, how old is it, in what dosage is being given, and by what route (injection, intravenous, orally, so on). Then, what are the side effects (all medications have side effects – many of which are deeply unpleasant). ). I view side effects both objectively from what I see and hear (read this blog post about Moldova for an example of what I call “Haloperidol haze”) and subjectively from the interviewee’s own perspective. I get this information by asking the person about the medication and its effect on their body and mind.
HOW: The second question is the issue of consent. Here I want to find out answers to questions like: Do you want to take the medication? Do you feel you have to? What would happen if you decide not to take the medication? What did the doctor tell you about the benefits of taking the meds and the side effects? About alternative types of medication, and non-medication alternatives? Has the person been coerced into signing a ‘consent form’ rendering him a so-called voluntary patient in law? What is the legal basis for forcing the treatment on the person? So on and so on.
Human rights monitoring is about asking polite and slightly naïve questions. I dig and dig until the answer becomes clear, however incredible the answer seems. Then I ask different people the same questions to triangulate the information. Through this process of asking questions and documenting the answers, some sort of truth emerges.
Dangerous clinical practices
I have serious concerns about the quality of clinical and nursing care in Uganda’s premiere psychiatric hospital, Butabika. Its mission is to “offer super specialized and general mental health services”. Our monitoring team didn’t see much super specialized care on the day of our visit. Instead, we saw dangerous clinical practice. Three examples:
Diagnosis and treatment => monitoring and advocacy
My diagnosis is that Butabika is a mental health service which needs an urgent injection of the rule of law. Not only are people arbitrarily detained, there is strong evidence of under-trained personnel practising dangerous medicine on people whose refusal of unwanted treatment is overridden, and who are not providing interventions to correct side effects to people who are rendered medically incapable of asking for help. Basic healthcare for somatic conditions is denied to people who are asking for such healthcare (see my previous blog post). Particularly where a person’s liberty is deprived, the state has an obligation to ensure that healthcare is provided.
Let’s ensure that Ruhakana Rugunda, the Ugandan Minister of Health is aware of the human rights abuses taking place on his watch. Please email him your concerns at this email address.